Monday, June 3, 2013

Roy Pomeroy, The life of an Artist Part II: From England to Ohio and New York.



by Kate Corbett Pollack

What happened to Roy Pomeroy in the years preceding his Hollywood arrival?  There is much more to his story, and continued research has revealed more details. 

After the death of Roy’s father, William Henry Jobbins, Jeanette and the boys moved back to England. Jeannette, then in her thirties, found herself a widow who needed to provide for two young boys. She had been studying and developing her ideas on aesthetics and cosmetology for many years, and in 1895 started a company using the Pomeroy name she so cherished: Mrs. Pomeroy. In an interview from the era, Jeannette said she wanted to be able to give her boys a good education, which was the impetus for starting her company.[i]It was on Old Bond St. in London, and specialized in several areas of beauty, including electrolysis, dermatology, and hair and nail care, and carried a line of cosmetics. Her shop was right next to the Royal Arcade, a mall where Queen Victoria’s tailor worked. Bond Street was known for its affluent, high society patrons. By 1905, the company had become a success, and Jeannette was famous for her ideas on improving one’s countenance without surgery using the powers of the mind, a technique she claimed to have learned in India. Mrs. Pomeroy had shops in Dublin, Glasgow, and Birmingham, and Cape Town and Johannesburg in South Africa. Her advertisements promised that “Mrs. Pomeroy can do more for your face than anyone else in the world.” [ii]

The Rome Daily Sentinel (Rome, New York) announced in its November 24, 1905 edition that Mrs. Jeannette Pomeroy, “female scientist” would be visiting the United States for a tour. The article mentioned that Jeannette had studied “Asiatic and European races”, and suggested that some of Jeannette’s thoughts on beauty were controversial:

“As soon as Mrs. Pomeroy has scientifically ascertained the percentage of beauty in the American women, a purpose for which she intends making a tour of the continent, and has discovered whether the trend of physical charms is progressive or retrogressive she will conduct a series of free lectures in which she will point out the racial faults in form and face, locate the causes and suggest the remedies.”

Jeannette’s secretary, Charles Helmstreet, explained her intentions to the press in this same article:

“This is altogether an aesthetic and not an ethical movement…As a lover of the beautiful she desires that all people become physically perfect. She spent years in India, where she was born and where she learned how to direct the mind so that it may have an influence over physical defects.”
During this time period, it was not uncommon, even among progressives, to believe that certain features and traits were genetic flaws and could be scientifically “corrected” or eliminated in order to fit an idealized vision of human perfection. Ideas like Jeannette’s parallel the Eugenics movement, which in the early 20th Century was accepted as scientific by the United States and many European continues.

By about 1906, the company went into voluntary liquidation due to a hostile business takeover that Jeanette had trouble navigating. A group of businessmen wished to capitalize off her success, and were able to legally gain rights to Mrs. Pomeroy. A new company was formed by her rivals called Mrs. Pomeroy Ltd. Men hadn’t previously been a large part of her business, which had a confidential nature due to women wishing to keep their beauty rituals a secret. Jeannette likely faced backlash from her loyal customers who did not wish for men to be involved. She separated from James Scale at the time and started another business, attempting to continue using the Pomeroy name and retain her original customer base. However, she was not legally able to do so, despite the fact that she had her name and that of her sons changed to Pomeroy.  Jeanette was ruined.

Defeated, Jeannette and her sons boarded an ocean liner for America. Her mother lived in Delaware, Ohio, where the family would stay. They arrived in America on March 30th, 1908. Roy was 15 and Arthur was 17. Their grandmother, Jeanette Gallagher Shepard[iii], was the matron of a house which boarded students on the Ohio Wesleyan College of Liberal Arts campus. The family went to live at the house, which was home to an eclectic mix of people including a family of four children whose parents were missionaries to South America. Roy was shortly afterwards accepted to the college.

Roy may not have ever known his biological father, who died when he was a year old, but he did inherit William’s artistic talent, as well as his mother’s scientific leanings. Roy studied electrical engineering at Ohio Wesleyan University, starting his freshman year at age 15. Arthur, also highly intelligent, had gone to Illinois to study entomology. By 1913, when he was 22 years old, Arthur was an entomologist at the United States Bureau of Entomology in Washington, DC. While Arthur had gone off on his own, Roy and his mother stuck together. She went with him wherever he traveled.

In 1913 Roy and his mother moved to Indianapolis, Indiana, where Roy had a studio in the Union Trust building. His illustrations appeared in the Indianapolis Star. Roy and Jeannette had an apartment on Julian Avenue in that city. It appears that the young man was taking care of and supporting his mother, who at this time was in her 60s.

By 1915, Roy was enrolled at the Art Academy of Cincinnati in Ohio, where he would study under Frank Duveneck, a talented artist who was a contemporary of Roy’s father and James McNeill Whistler’s back in 1880s Venice. Duveneck had been in Venice with a group of students at the time, and they had become enthralled with Whistler, who relished the attention and volunteered to show them some of his techniques (William Henry Jobbins, who disliked Whistler, was undoubtedly rolling his eyes the entire time.)  Duveneck became a father-figure and mentor for Roy, and in his later biographies, Roy would credit the college and Duveneck as major influences on his career.

While in Ohio, Roy took a job as an artist for the Cincinnati Times-Star and the Dayton Journal, and did illustrations for Scribner’s, one of the most popular magazines in the country at the time. He also took a post-graduate course in “photographic chemistry”, according to his bio in the 1940 issue of Camera Craft magazine. Shortly after his graduation, Roy and Jeanette moved to New York. There Roy began his work as a portrait painter and scenic artist, as outlined in Part I of the story. However, there is much more to Roy’s New York years than initially written about in that post.

After his return to New York from WWI where he developed cameras for the Royal Air Force, Roy had developed a friendship with a handsome, enterprising young man who had similar interests: Nicholas Vladimir de Lippe Lipsky, a Russian prince who had arrived in New York in 1920 as part of the ballet company of Anna Pavlova. Anna Pavlova (1881-1931) was the first ballerina to tour the world, and founded her own ballet company. Roy had been given $50,000 by the British government for his camera inventions used during the war. He would have had the money at this time to keep up with a crowd of aristocratic people.[iv]

deLipsky had studied art, music and chemistry in Russia at the Imperial Universities, and had exhibited his theatre lighting and designs for European royalty. He was a master of innovative theatre lighting and used colored lights to create effects never before seen on the stage. Due to complex circumstances in Europe including the Russian Revolution, Lippe first traveled to Buckingham palace to stay, and found his way to America from there with Anna’s company by 1920.

Nicholas de Lipsky was well-received in New York, and designed sets for the Manhattan Opera House, the Criterion Theatre, and the Greenwich Village Follies. He also studied photography, and was able to transform negatives, using chemicals to make some aspects of photographs appear and others to disappear. He used a similar concept with his stage sets, making a scene change from night to day, inside to outside, and wintertime to summer in a matter of seconds. This was highly original and innovative for the early 20th century. An October, 1921 article in the New York Evening Post reported that de Lipsky “revolutionized the concept of stage setting in the theatre that has been built up laboriously in the last fifty years.”  deLipsky’s innovations in photography were similar to Roy Pomeroy’s, and by 1921, local theatre news was reporting that the two men had teamed up to create stage effects for the Greenwich Village Follies . They also worked together on photoplays, which were films taken of the stage. Their work was clearly impressive and often astounding, according to newspaper and magazine articles from the era, which covered many of their projects.

Around this time, Roy met his future wife, Miss Sylvia Jewel, whose real name was Elizabeth Whittaker. Sylvia had moved to the city from Kentucky. She was born in Paris, Bourbon County, on 11 March 1894 to C. G. Whittaker and Sarah Newman. An aspiring actress, Sylvia worked as an artist’s model, and was very well-known as one of the most famous models around. In the April 24th, 1919 edition of the Fort Wayne News Sentinel of Indiana, Sylvia was called “the perfect woman”:

“The perfect woman has been found. At least that is the belief of many of the best known artists of New York. She is Miss Sylvia Jewel and she lives in a tiny room on the top of one of New York’s skyscrapers. Perhaps her wonderful golden hair has pleased you on the cover of your favorite magazine or her pretty face in the illustrations of the latest books.[v]

The couple most likely met when Sylvia posed for one of Roy’s many illustrations at his artist’s studio. Sylvia was part of a group of artists called “The Society of Illustrators”, formed in 1901 to promote art and illustrations and have occasional exhibits. Women were not initially allowed in the group, but Sylvia had performed with them in a stage show at the Garden Theatre in 1919, the year before they decided to admit women, and John Jacob Astor was in the audience. It is possible Sylvia’s talent influenced the group’s decision. Among the members was Charles Dana Gibson, creator of the Gibson Girl, and Frank Godwin, illustrator and comic artist.

Sylvia was the subject of American Impressionist Childe Hassam’s oil painting “Sylvia Jewell” which was exhibited at the Albright Art Gallery in Buffalo, New York in September of 1920.[vi]  When Sylvia wasn’t modeling, according to the 1920 census, she worked in the movies. In 1922, she was working for the Spencer Lens Company in New York.  It is possible that Sylvia’s connections led Roy to become introduced to Hollywood producer Jesse L. Lasky.

Roy’s Hollywood opportunity couldn’t have come at a better time: he had become embroiled in highly publicized scandal involving Nicholas de Lipsky. The married prince had been living with his mistress, Countess Claude de Montesse, in a rooming-house on West 88th St in Manhattan, under the guise that they were brother and sister. The Countess became pregnant, and an illegal abortion was performed by a private doctor. The Countess as a result became septic. Abortion, illegal in the United States before 1973, was sometimes performed in seclusion by a doctor in a woman’s home for a few thousand dollars. Often, a doctor did not know how to do one, and when the woman began to die, the doctor would flee the scene in order to avoid prosecution. This is what happened in the case of the Countess. As she languished, slowly and painfully dying, Roy and Nicholas frantically rushed to find a doctor who would treat her. Roy called his own doctor, who arrived at the scene, took one look at the dying Countess and refused to have anything to do with it. He knew she had received an illegal abortion, so he would not treat her. Nicholas managed to procure another doctor to operate, but by then, it was too late. The Countess died from septic peritonitis. The story would not have come to light if it hadn’t been for another brewing scandal: Nicholas’ estranged wife, Elaine, began a divorce proceeding in 1923, alleging that he had run off with her sister. Princess Elaine de Lipsky went to the press, and told them every sordid detail involving the Prince that she could think of, including the death of the Countess.[vii]

The story had so many layers of scandal: royal intrigue, illegal abortion, adultery and death; newspapers and tabloids pounced on it, running regular features. Roy Pomeroy’s name was frequently mentioned in conjunction with the story. A December, 1923 New York Times article reported that the police were looking to question him. Jesse L. Lasky’s arrival in Roy’s life had occurred at the perfect time, and provided him with a chance to leave New York for Hollywood at the height of the scandal.

Jeanette had continued to live with Roy this entire time, and was even mentioned in part of the scandal with Lipsky. She was the one who told de Lipsky’s landlord that he and the countess were not brother and sister. It appears at this time that Roy must have been out of money and unable to support his mother, because she was deported third class back to England. Perhaps his extravagant lifestyle with de Lipsky had drained his finances. Maintaining a studio in Manhattan, funding inventions and dating the most sought-after artist’s model in the city most likely contributed to his financial strains.

After arriving in California, Roy and Sylvia were married in Los Angeles in 1922. It seems she may have settled into married life at the time, because little is known about her after this date. Roy’s mother retired in England, where she died in Dartford, Kent in 1932. And in 1947, Roy took an overdose of sleeping pills.

What caused Roy to commit suicide? Both he and his mother reached very high levels of success, only to have it taken away from them. Jeannette wasn’t able to ever recover her success, and instead seemed to focus her attention on Roy, perhaps pushing him to achieve instead. Roy was clearly a talented, hard worker who easily fell in with similar people. However, their influence on him could be damaging. From his experience with de Lipsky to his difficulties in Hollywood, Roy found trouble interlaced with fame. He was never able to truly be a part of Hollywood royalty and perhaps felt bitter. It is also possible that he suffered from depression.  After things fell apart with Paramount, Roy attempted to revive his career in England and help that country move into the talking picture era. However, this endeavor was unsuccessful. Was it Roy’s arrogant attitude that again led him to trouble in England? As we saw in Part I of this story, Roy returned to America and worked for a spell at RKO. However, he was unable to remain at any studio for long.

Like his mother, Roy’s work and creations as a director and effects technician were usurped and taken over by a group of people who did not originate them. Roy was pushed out of his position as sound effects technician by William DeMille, in a takeover masterminded by Jesse L. Lasky, just as his mother’s company had been effectively stolen from her by savvy businessmen. Neither was ever able to regain their former glory. Perhaps the disappointment was too much for Roy to bear.

What was the nature of Roy’s relationship with his mother? After her business failed, Jeannette invested a lot of energy into being around Roy all the time. It is possible she was trying to make him the success that she wasn’t. If this is so, it is possible that Roy felt he had failed his mother, and perhaps his wife, who was someone who also desired fame and success. For some reason Roy did not bring his mother with him to Hollywood, and Sylvia did not seem to remember Jeannette’s name on Roy’s death certificate despite the fact that Jeannette had lived with Roy almost up to his removal to California with Sylvia. Did Roy simply not talk about his mother with his wife? Roy could have continued to support his mother after he and Sylvia moved to California and he started making real money. Did he have her deported because he could no longer stand being around her?

Sylvia died on February 26, 1965 in Woodland Hills, Los Angeles, an affluent area. She was 70. It does not seem that she remarried.

There are many questions that remain unanswered about Roy Pomeroy’s life. More research may be able to clear some of them up. In the meantime, we welcome readers to speculate. It is interesting also to note that Roy’s Oscar statuette for Engineering Effects for his work on “Wings” is still missing. Roy and Sylvia did not have any children. Perhaps there is a reader who has some information that could lead to the discovery of Roy’s Oscar.




[i]“A Successful Business Woman. Mrs. Pomeroy.” The Mail and Empire, Toronto, Saturday March 11, 1899. p. 5 col 4-7.

[ii]Mrs. Pomeroy. Advertisement.Who's Who 1905 1905: Ii. Print.
[iii]During the Civil War, “Soldier’s Fairs” were held to raise money for the Union, promote enlistment, and endow orphan’s asylums, among other things. Jeanette Gallagher Shepherd sent silk worms from India to aid in this effort. She had her own silk-growing establishment there.

[iv]“Pomeroy Has Mastered Many Professions”, The Standard Union, Brooklyn, NY. October 13, 1929 p.9 col 5.

[v]Dainty 120-Pound, Five-Foot Five New Yorker Considered By Many As Most Perfect Woman” article, Syracuse Journal, Syracuse, Onondaga County, New York, 18 Apr 1919, p. 12/col. 1-3

[vi]Childe Hassom was a favorite artist of Brooke Astor’s. A painting she had of his, “Up the Avenue from Thirty-Fourth Street” was sold by her son Anthony Marshall in 2002 for $10,000,000. The painting was then sold by the buyer almost immediately afterwards for $20,000,000. Originally, Brooke had bequeathed the painting to the Metropolitan Museum of Art.Anthony Marshall had conned his senile mother out of her beloved painting so he could pocket the money, a scheme that was at the height of the scandal involving the Astor family in the late 2000s. Anthony Marshall was sentenced to prison.

[vii] “Death of Countess Here Investigated” article, The New York Times, New York City, New York County, New York, 22 Dec 1923, p. 2/col. 2

Monday, April 22, 2013

Buckland, Massachusetts and the Psychology of Epidemic Disease

by Kate Corbett Pollack  

The LORD shall smite thee with a consumption, and with a fever, and with an inflammation, and with an extreme burning, and with the sword, and with blasting, and with mildew; and they shall pursue thee until thou perish. —Deuteronomy 28:22 

Readers familiar with the Spaulding family might recall my September 2011 blog post, “Calvinism and Epidemic Disease in the Susanna Cole Letters”. In that post, I discussed the ways that the Calvinist religion was used by its followers in Buckland, Massachusetts, to explain the epidemic diseases that ravaged the village for over a fifty-year period. I used the letters in our archives written by the Spaulding and Pomeroy families during this time (1800-1850) as the basis for this research. Since writing this article, I have learned more about the psychology of epidemic disease and have seen parallels in reactions from Buckland villagers to disease and illness in the early 1800s to reactions to contemporary disorders such as Autism. There are also similarities with both of these responses and those to the Great Plague of London in 1665. Guided by Philip Strong’s essay Epidemic psychology: a model, this article will address what appears to be a common human psychological reaction to epidemics, regardless of the time period. Epidemic disease can also function to explain the treatment of Josiah Spaulding, Jr. (1785-1867) who was kept in a cage in the homes of his family for 57 years. 

Epidemics have, throughout history, invoked a common psychological response in humans from the Stone Age to the AIDS epidemic, even to current issues of diabetes, obesity and Autism. In the midst of a serious, ongoing health crisis, humans look for an answer, any answer, to the problem. In early 1800s Buckland, choices for an explanation of disease were limited. Today, science provides us with many more options. However, this has not stopped large numbers of people from continuing to seek the types of explanations commonly sought in Buckland or 1665 London. The powerful psychological response to illness can be difficult to sway, and manifests in similar ways throughout history. 

Autism is a current disorder that upon examination provides insight to human psychological response to epidemics. Looking to external sources and imagining a conspiracy is at work are examples. The opinion that an outside source triggers or has triggered the onset of Autism is one held by communities who are seeking an explanation to the condition and do not trust the average doctor or scientist who maintains the cause is biological and internal. These communities are largely made up of those who are either against vaccinations or in favor of a limited vaccine schedule. They argue that vaccinations are the cause of Autism, despite that claim being widely discredited by doctors, and the initial research it was based upon found to be fraudulent. There is a correlation with the rise in autism diagnoses and the rise in the MMR vaccine, but causation has been disproved.i This has not stopped people from believing that all vaccines are a potential cause, however. This reaction is a common one in the face of widespread illness. In Philip Strong’s Epidemic psychology: a model, he explores the “fear, panic, stigma, moralizing and calls to action” that seem to characterize the “immediate reaction” to an epidemic.ii

Autism is not the type of “large, fatal epidemic” Strong is referring to, but the social responses he outlines in this essay are characteristics that considerable numbers of the American, British and Australian populations have displayed in response to Autism, a condition that is arguably not an epidemic at all, but is viewed by many as being so due to the increase in diagnoses over the last few decades. This increase, doctors and scientists explain, is due to better identification, and expansion of the definition to include a wider spectrum of Autism including Asperger’s disorder. Scientists also maintain that these disorders have existed for a long time, if they are to be characterized as “disorders” in the first place. Renowned Autism researcher Simon Baron-Cohen maintains that Einstein and Newton both had symptoms of Autism and Asperger’s, and that the condition can contribute to a better understanding of scientific and mathematical systems.iii

Despite increased information and positive perspectives on the condition, the propensity for “fear, panic, stigma, moralizing and calls to action” remain strong. Ideas that an outside cause in the environment, a governmental conspiracy or even religious reasons (anti-vaccination activist Jenny McCarthy frequently references a spiritual calling from God to inform people) are the cause of Autism continue to proliferate. There is fear and panic around the idea that vaccines contain harmful chemicals like anti-freeze, and that conspiratorial doctors and scientists are working together to harm children for pharmaceutical profit.iv Calls to action include anti-vaccination groups that push for changes in vaccines or to not vaccinate at all. Other outside sources have been looked to such as diet and environmental factors, for example. Dr. Baron-Cohen believes that the disorder is hormonal and develops in the womb. There is not yet a solid explanation for the cause of Autism, but there is no evidence that it is caused by vaccines. 

During the Great Plague of London, a similar reaction to the devastation of the Black Death occurred. In the medical pamphlet The Shutting Up Infected Houses As It Is Practiced in England Soberly Debated (1665), possible causes of the Black Death are discussed. (During the plague, infected people would be shut up in their own houses.) The causes are almost all from external environmental sources. Food features prominently on the list: 
23. By a Dinner of Soales in Fifth street 
24. By a dish of Eels. 
26. By a Codling Tart and Cream 
27. By a Dish of French Beanes. 
28. By Cabbages. 
29. By Turneps and Carrets. 

The list continues and includes humans (typically poor people), animals, clothing and places of ill repute like “Scurvy Tipling Houses and Bowling Allies.”v The idea that people considered undesirable or different by the rest of the population are somehow responsible for disease or that God is angry because of these people and making everyone sick is still a common reaction to epidemics. The Plague was thought of as a disease that came from the poor, and upper classes would try to hide the fact that they’d contacted it out of embarrassment. Gay people being blamed for AIDS is an example of modern day epidemic scapegoating. Profit-hungry chemists, doctors and pharmaceutical companies being blamed for producing Autism-causing vaccines is another. If a segment of the population’s influence could be decreased or eliminated, then these diseases would go away, according to this logic. 

Vaccines do not cause Autism, but what they do accomplish is to prevent a variety of life-threatening, debilitating illnesses that caused high mortality rates and suffering for most of human history. Public health and medical science have also put an end to these diseases almost entirely in the United States, Europe and many developing countries. The Black Plague decimated European cities in regular intervals for almost 300 years. The Great Plague of London in 1665 is estimated to have killed over 100,000 people. During its height, 8,000 died in London per week.vi Anyone who was able to fled the city, but most remained within city limits to die. We know today that fleas carried the disease, but during this era, the cause of the plague was unknown, as was what to do to cure it. People believed that miasma, or contaminated air was a cause, but it wasn’t known for certain. Hysteria resulted. Londoners, thinking a possible cause was cats and dogs, killed over 40,000 of the animals. The result increased the flea population, as fleas now had fewer animal hosts and turned to humans instead, exacerbating the Plague.vii

Today, the Plague is rarely seen. Nor are the diseases that were a part of everyday life for the Spaulding family and residents of Buckland, Massachusetts in the nineteenth century. These included cholera, dysentery, typhoid, tuberculosis, yellow fever and measles outbreaks. These illnesses were a part of everyday life for the villagers in epidemic years. Living with constant epidemics impacted the psychology of Buckland residents in ways much like the Plague impacted the psychology of Londoners.

Buckland residents reacted to epidemics in the way that humans tend to. What occurred was fear, paranoia, hysteria, blame and looking to an external, somewhat conspiratorial source, in this case God, as the reason. Certainly there was fear involved with this belief. The Spaulding letters repeatedly express feelings of wariness, helplessness, depression and anxiety in response to the idea that God is hurting and killing Buckland villagers for reasons that must be their own fault. The “call to action” was church revivals, penitence and an obsession with religion in all areas of life. Clearly the constant epidemics began to define the mindset of the Buckland residents. Nancy Spaulding wrote to Mary Pomeroy on March 27, 1810:  

Dear Sister…When we behold the sprightly youth whose chicks glow with beauty and whose limbs are full of activity cut down by the stroke of death and layed in the silent grave never more to be beheld by mortal eyes there to remain until the arch angel shall sound the trump of God…we one or both of us shall be numbered with the dead our bodys must be layed in the silent tomb… 

The women were in their early twenties at this time. From Deborah Spaulding to Mary Pomeroy, April 20th, circa 1814: 

 We who are now in the bloom of youth are as liable to die at any age we had ought to be in preparation for death judgment and eternity many of our fellow mortals are dying around us some in by a sudden and surprising manner… 

From Deborah Trowbridge to David and Mary Ann Pomeroy, April 17, 1839:  

God is speaking to us in accents as loud as thunder, to be also ready how soon and sudden we may be called, for we know not. Short has been the separation of your Dear Mother from your beloved child, this new wound has opened the other afresh may you my dear friends be still and know it is god that has done it… 

Stigma was directed at anyone who fell outside the category of a proper religious person. Mary Ann Pomeroy wrote in her 1850 diary when she was 14 years old of attending church almost constantly and being punished when she misbehaved by not being allowed to go, which for her was very upsetting, since she believed that she was going to die soon, as so many others around her were. Church was a possible way to protect herself. 

Epidemics and the Incarceration of Josiah Spaulding 

Josiah Spaulding, as we have seen in previous posts, was not like everyone else in Buckland. He challenged his father’s religious beliefs, for some reason did not fit in at Williams College, and wanted to spend his time in Southampton having fun instead of following in his father’s footsteps. There was also something clearly different about his mental state. It is difficult to say what exactly he was suffering from, since it was over 200 years ago and there is scanty evidence. However, Spaulding family letters indicate that in 1812 or around that year, at age 23 or 24, Josiah was put in a cage by his father, where he would live out the duration of his life. While it is possible that he became violent or aggressive, his letters to his family are very gentle-there is no evidence of violence, but there is evidence of kindness. Whatever the case, Josiah was clearly different. Death was a constant in Buckland and the surrounding area during the early to mid-1800s, as we have seen. Josiah’s sister, Mary Spaulding, almost died in 1811 after giving birth, lost a baby in 1814, and her husband in 1815, when he was only 33, and by 1816 was facing the possibility that her surviving daughter might also die. The feelings of terror that must have resulted in the family only strengthened the need for Josiah to be kept under control. 

 Around 1814 the family almost lost youngest daughter Lydia Spaulding from tuberculosis, a disease she would suffer from for the next twenty years. This type of pattern of near death and loss was not unusual for Buckland families. Nearly everyone in the Spaulding family eventually died of a now-preventable disease, everyone that is, except for Josiah. Although he came into contact with Lydia (tuberculosis) and his sister Deborah (typhoid and dysentery)on a regular basis, and in 1840 nearly all of the next door neighbors died of “Spring Fever”, Josiah lived to be 81. His niece, Mary Williams Howes, wrote to her Aunt in Southampton in 1840 of the “Spring Fever” epidemic that swept Buckland that year:  

Death that formidable adversary of mankind has snatched from our midst the man of years and the interesting youth and the bell has hardly ceased its tolling for another wrhose cold remains are waiting for the grave…You have probably heard of the deaths of Mr. Alexander Ward, Mrs. Hall, Mrs. Upton, Mrs. Daniel Bement, and Mrs. Thacher, all of whom died some time ago. But a week last Monday night this “grim messenger” entered the abode of our nearest neighbors and nipped the brightest flower of the family. The days of this mourning had scarcely passed for their little babe when a greater affliction came upon them. One remarkable for her apt evil, her uncommon rudeness, and her engaging manner has left us. But she died not as a true Christian dies, but pleading for mercy even in the agonies of death and the mortal remains of Eliza Townsly are deposited in the churchyard. 

Epidemics continued to outbreak into the 1850s, with cases of tuberculosis, then known as consumption, and typhoid fever striking Spaulding family members and Buckland area residents. 

The hysteria that resulted can be identified in almost every Spaulding and Pomeroy family letter, as indicated in the excerpts above. Josiah’s letters to his father (as written about in my 2011 post viii) indicate that he did not share his father’s Calvinist beliefs. While this type of behavior is normal today, and young people are often expected to show a certain amount of rebellion, it was not normal in 1812, and would have been completely unacceptable in the Puritan tradition. Josiah’s incarceration, which is unusual, should be viewed in the context of epidemic disease, since that is what was occurring at the time. 

There are many factors in his case that add up to the complex reason for his being kept in a cage, and some may weigh more heavily than others. But in the environment of “fear, panic, stigma, moralizing and calls to action”, someone who challenged the status quo could be looked at as a serious threat to social order. The villagers sincerely believed that God was testing them, angry with them; killing their families and friends for unknown reasons. Everyone went to the same church to listen to Reverend Spaulding talk about it; Reverend Spaulding with the very different son. Keeping Josiah confined was a way of maintaining control and order in Buckland society. Something was very out of order, because of the amount of sickness and death, and 1816’s “year of no summer”, when crop failure occurred due to weather changes. Disease and crop failure were out of the control of Buckland villagers. What they could try to control was each other. Josiah’s incarceration in the family home by his father had the support of the Buckland villagers, and Spaulding family neighbors were invested in helping to care for him. Everyone knew about Josiah. The shared mentality was that the cage was where Josiah belonged; enforced by Reverend Spaulding’s religious sermons which functioned to explain the rampant disease and death. 

In the years after Josiah’s incarceration, disease continued to be a constant, and more and more members joined the First Congregational Church of Buckland, where they were baptized by Reverend Spaulding. In 1816, the year without a summer, 16 people were inducted. In 1822, the year before his death,Reverend Spaulding inducted a record number of new congregants into the church-over 60 people, including the founder of Mount Holyoke College, Mary Lyon.ix

Eventually, the source and causes of these diseases was discovered, and medicine followed suit. Vaccinations were and continue to be a large part of staving off the types of epidemics that routinely threatened Buckland. As a result of vaccination rates falling, there has been a resurgence of the types of diseases common in the Spaulding’s era. In 2011, according to the Centers of Disease Control, incidence of measles outbreaks reached a 15 year high, and Pertussis outbreak was at epidemic levels.x It is interesting to note that the fearful and suspicious reaction towards vaccines is in fact bringing back epidemic disease to a society that has all but forgotten what life was like before them. Like the Great Plague of London, human’s suspicious reactions to cats and dogs as potential carriers exacerbated the spread of disease. Looking at vaccines as the cause of illness today is ironically leading to actual illnesses. Because of epidemic psychology, humans can unwittingly cause further harm to their own societies. 

The environment of constant disease and sickness that the Spaulding family spent their lives in made it hard to be a happy person. If their letters are any indication, they were fraught with anxiety and depression, and consumed by thoughts of death. The main comfort for them was the afterlife, where they would be reunited with their lost loved ones. This glimpse into a time when medical science and technology was almost non-existent reveals what the reality was for people who could do nothing to stop disease. It was not too far from the days of the Black Plague. Today, if current trends continue, we could be entering a new era of epidemic disease. Medical science has the power to eradicate disease, but it takes the participation of the population to work. If distrust and misunderstanding of vaccinations continues to rise, the era of the Spauldings will not be such a distant memory. 

 Further Sources: 

"Autism Risk Unrelated to Total Vaccine Exposure in Early Childhood." NIMH RSS. National Institutes of Mental Health, 29 Mar. 2013. Web. 04 Apr. 2013. 

Brodman, Estelle. "Medieval Epidemics." Journal of the Medical Library Association 41(3).July (1953): 265-72. US National Library of Medicine.National Institutes of Health.Web. 4 Apr. 2013. 

Fombonne, Eric, M.D. "What's Behind the Rise in Autism?" Interview. PBS Frontline. PBS, 29 Dec. 2009. Web. 4 Apr. 2013.

Greven, Philip J., The Protestant Temperament: Patterns of Child-Rearing, Religious Experience, and the Self in Early America. University of Chicago Press: 1988. 

Holt, D. "The Measles Lie, and the Ongoing Ad Campaign Disguised as News." NaturalNews. NaturalNews.com, 6 May 2012. Web. 04 Apr. 2013. 

Offit, Paul A., M.D. "The Problem WithDr Bob's Alternative Vaccine Schedule." The Problem WithDr Bob's Alternative Vaccine Schedule. Pediatrics, n.d. Web. 04 Apr. 2013. 

"The Vaccine War."PBS. PBS, 27 Apr. 2010. Web. 04 Apr. 2013 

Sears, Bob, M.D. "So Autism Is (now Even More) Common . . . Anybody Care Yet?" Lisa Ackerman Real Help Now. TACA, 20 Mar. 2013. Web. 04 Apr. 2013. 

http://www.generationrescue.org/ _________________________________________________ 

 i. Cohen, Elizabeth, and Miriam Falco."Retracted Autism Study an 'elaborate Fraud,' British Journal Finds."CNN. Cable News Network, 05 Jan. 2011. Web. 19 Mar. 2013. 

ii. Strong, Philip. "Epidemic Psychology: A Model." Sociology of Health and Illness 12.3 (1990): 249. Print. 

iii. Muir, Hazel. "Einstein and Newton Showed Signs of Autism." - 30 April 2003. New Scientist, 30 Apr. 2003. Web. 19 Mar. 2013. 

iv. Gorski, David. "Science-Based Medicine."Jenny McCarthy, Jim Carrey, and Green Our Vaccines: Anti-vaccine, Not pro-safe Vaccine”. Science-Based Medicine, 9 June 2008. 

v. Sequence 1: The Shutting up Infected Houses as It Is Practised in England Soberly Debated :by Way of Address from the Poor Souls That Are Visited, to Their Brethren That Are Free : With Observations on the Wayes Whereby the Present Infection Hath Spread : As Also a Certain Method of Diet, Attendance, Lodging and Physick, Experimented in the Recovery of Many Sick Persons. [London] : [s.n.], Printed in the Year MDCLXV [1665]., Harvard University Library PDS. 

vi. "The Great Plague of London, 1665." Open Collections Program: Contagion,.Harvard University Library Open Collections Program, n.d. Web. 02 Apr. 2013. 

vii. Ross, David. "The London Plague of 1665."The London Plague 1665.Britian Express, n.d. Web. 02 Apr. 2013. 

viii. http://americanpomeroys.blogspot.com/2011/11/only-being-of-senceless-existence.html 

ix. Rev. Mortimer Blake, A Centurial History of the Mendon Association of the Congregational Ministers, with the Centennial Address, Delivered at Franklin, Mass, Nov. 19, 1851, and Biographical Sketches of the Members and Licentiates (Boston: Sewall Harding, 1853) 

x. Castillo, Michelle. "CDC: US Whooping Cough Cases Rising at Epidemic Rate." CBSNews. CBS Interactive, 19 July 2012. Web. 02 Apr. 2013. xi. Beasley, David. "Measles Cases Reached 15-year High in 2011: CDC." Reuters. Thomson Reuters, 20 Apr. 2012. Web. 02 Apr. 2013.

Friday, March 15, 2013

THE LABYRINTH OF CANADIAN POMEROYS PART II

by Alethea “Lee” Connolly 

While we continue sleuthing through old deeds, wills, journals, letters, and church records, we spend a good amount of time sifting through images on the computer screen for newly posted resources. But sometimes we find gold, just because fellow searchers come forward and share what they found. They provide the missing link that leads us giant steps forward. Much research today is about such generosity and collaboration.

THE QUEBEC PONTBRIAND/POMEROY CONNECTION IN ONONDAGA
AND OSWEGO COUNTY

Recently, these random acts of kindness came my way when I continued researching the French Canadian brothers, Louis and Germain Pontbriand, who, for some reason, changed their name to Pomeroy when they emigrated from Canada to the United States. (See our August Blog) We discovered Louis and Jeremiah had the same father, but different mothers. They were half brothers. Louis’ mother was Marie Louise Martin dit Pelland (first wife, deceased). Germain/Jeremiah was a son of Louise Preville (second wife of the elder Louis). This was a very large family, though not uncommon for the times in French Canadian families. Therefore, age differences between siblings sometimes ranged between fifteen to twenty years.

Since our August posting, I’ve received information from several descendants of these Pontbriand/Pomeroys. The 1850 federal census showed Jeremiah and family then living in Syracuse, and later in nearby Lysander, New York. One descendant of Jeremiah sent me a very clear photo of the grave stone of John and Harriett Pomeroy Pomeroy, his great grandparents, located in Oak View cemetery, Frankfort, Herkimer County, New York.1 The inscription on the gravestone shows their new POMEROY POMEROY surname identity.

Gravestone of John Pomeroy and wife Harriet Pomeroy Pomeroy
 His ancestors, are both of Pontbriand lineage, as Harriett was a daughter of Jeremiah, and John, the son of his Jeremiah’s elder brother Louis. Richard, who sent the photos, is a great grandson, of Gertrude, John and Harriett’s daughter.

Richard’s cousin, Diane, also sent us family information. She descends from Jasper, John and Harriett’s son. She told us about Harriett’s sudden death in December, 1917. It was reported a “strangulation, ” Diane explained Harriet had a condition of a goiter which restricted her throat. Tragically, one day, while doing food preparation, she choked when she ate some peas! Who would have known such a detail?

Another cousin, Jane, sent me a copy of the wedding photo of her great grandparents, Jasper Pomeroy and Maud Littlewood. Jasper and Maud married in 1906 in Frankfort, New York. Jane also sent copies of family obituaries, and Jay’s (Jasper’s) death certificate, which noted he was born in Brewerton, New York, where the family lived before moving to Herkimer County. Every tidbit of information illuminates the portrait of a family and leads to other investigations.
Wedding photo of Jasper Pomeroy and Maud Littlewood
In fact, it was a comment of Diane’s that prompted me to go back and look at the Onondaga County Poor house records. She mentioned Jeremiah had been sheltered at the poor house prior to his death. These records indicate that prior to his admission in May 1888 he had been a “salt boiler,” not an unusual occupation for Syracuse men in that time period. Some might say Syracuse, New York was the city built on salt, as this industry started early and lasted lucratively until into the early 1900s. That was a very tough occupation. In the days of corporate salt boiling “men worked in 90-degree heat and humidity, 12 hours a day, seven days a week, from April to November, boiling brine to isolate salt,” according to one journalist.2 They could produce three to four bushels in five hours. The poorhouse record confirmed Jeremiah’s birth in Canada; that he had five brothers and two sisters, and died while in the poorhouse, either in 1890 or 1891.3

POMEROY/PONTBRIANTS IN OSWEGO COUNTY

 While we knew Jeremiah and family moved between Onondaga, Oneida and Madison Counties in the 1860s, we just recently noticed he was in in Oswego County, likely not far from Louis, his elder brother, for several years. My colleague Barbara Dix, historian for the Town of Schroeppel, checked the 1855 NYS census and found PUMEROY family.4 The census taker used initials for given names, but we were still able to establish this was Jeremiah “Pomeroy”. If information on the record is accurate, especially the birth locations and ages of the children, then it seems Jeremiah and family had spent ten years in Onondaga County before coming in 1854 into Oswego County. Since all of his children were recorded as born in Oswego County, we estimate he was in this county perhaps by 1851. We now speculate that the Pontbriands arrival into this area of New York is about the year 1844.

We know that Jeremiah and family were in Verona, Oneida County in 1860, then for a few years in Bridgeport, Madison County, before coming back and settling in Onondaga County. It is here that his daughter Harriett married John Pomeroy, and where their three children Jasper, Gertrude and Wayne are born. They later moved east, to Herkimer County, and then west to Ohio, as our generous correspondents have shared. Other descendants of Jeremiah have been more difficult to trace. One daughter, Maria, married in 1883, when in her late thirties, to Brazil Pepper, and they settled in Granby. The 1900 census data indicates one child born to Maria, not then living in the household.5 It is not clear whether this child was born to Brazil and Maria.

 It is not surprising that some of Jeremiah descendants remained in the Granby area, while others went to Herkimer, and Ohio, as their uncle, Lewis Pomeroy, and their “cousins” remained there. When son Lewis Pomeroy died in 1908, his will identified him by both surnames of Pomeroy and Pontbriant.6 This discovery propelled much of our extended French-Canadian research resulting in grandchildren with the names of DAVIS and VIEW. Many of his children remained in the county. Daughters and granddaughters married into households with surnames such as MURRY, DAVIS, VIEW, WILLIAMS, ADAMS, LA BEEF and BURDEN. Perhaps now they will know that some of their ancestors were once Pontbriants from Quebec whose surname was changed to Pomeroy!

POMEROYS FROM STANSTEAD, QUEBEC THAT MIGRATED INTO NEW YORK

In the midst of digging through Quebec records for information about the Louis and Jeremiah family lines, I came across another puzzle. Several years ago I researched Judge Selah Pomeroy who, migrated from Vermont into Stanstead, Quebec in the early 1800s, where he raised his family. They were direct descendants of the Eltweed line. We knew Nancy Pomeroy, a daughter of Judge Selah’s son Hazen Pomeroy Sr., and his wife Lois Mansur, married Horace Wells in Syracuse, New York in 1847. 7 It was curious, but didn’t, at the time, prompt any intensive investigation.

Then one day, our county historical association archivist mentioned to our director that she had seen a Pomeroy name in an old diary she had been looking through. When I went to examine it, I learned the name was “Adele Pomeroy.”8 I recognized Adele as Nancy Pomeroy (Wells) sister. She was, according to this small journal, employed in 1847 as a teacher in a select school in Syracuse, which was just opened by Madame Anastasie Julia Raoul. Madame Raoul’s life had its own mysteries and secrets. By 1847, her fortune was depleted. With debts piling on her doorstep, she started a select school, and saved herself from the poorhouse.9 This meant that two sisters, Nancy and Adele Pomeroy, daughters of Hazen Pomeroy Sr., Judge Selah’s son, and wife Lois Mansur, were in Syracuse in 1847 and 1848. Had Adele read some advertisement for teachers, and taken advantage of this opportunity?

It was certainly an interesting coincidence that two families from Quebec who were, or became Pomeroys, ended up in Syracuse, between 1847 and 1850. Was there any connection of these Stanstead Pomeroys to the Louis and Jeremiah Pontbriand/Pomeroys? It was a longshot speculation, but puzzles and labyrinths are the peculiar territory of genealogists.

 I started to trace the Horace and Nancy Wells family unit. I found that in the 1850 U. S. census record they were in Broome County, and was surprised at their household members. Nancy and Horace were living in Chenango then, with sister, Louisa, and their 11 year old brother Selah.10 Further research showed that brother Charles was in the U. S. at least by 1854, when he married Mary Calkins.11 Perhaps he traveled with them, and then the siblings split up. It seemed like half of Hazen Pomeroy’s family bolted out of Stanstead for the United States!

 In tracing the descendants of the Stanstead Pomeroy sisters and their brother Charles, I found some stayed in the United States, and moved west, but some descendants returned to Canada, though not to Quebec. Nancy and Horace moved west to Illinois Her sisters, and brother Charles, married and a multitude of descendants have been traced – whose surnames are HARPER, SMITH, REED, LAFRANCE, FLETCHER and CURTIS.

Charles married Mary Calkins, but five years after their marriage (1859) he died in Michigan at age 35, leaving a wife and two children. I was able to trace descendants of his son, Charles W. Pomeroy, but not his daughter Mary. Another “act of random kindness” from Guy, a great-great-grandson of Charles W. Pomeroy, filled in some interesting family details, because his great grandmother, Nettie (Pomeroy) Curtis left family notes. Guy shared with us some of Nettie’s memories. She wrote that “when her (Nancy’s) brother Charles died, she took his little daughter Carrie to raise.” She also wrote that Horace, had a “furniture business in Troy” and “was a professional singer” of both church and opera music. Such recollections spice up a family history!

I still don’t know what motivated the three sisters (Nancy, Adele and Emily Louisa), and their brother Charles to move to the U.S., but I found no connection between the Quebec Pontbriands and the Stanstead “Eltweed” Pomeroys.

“THE STRANGE CASE OF PETER POMEROY”

Sometimes when you follow a loose string through a labyrinth, you end up somewhere in an unknown land, maybe with Dorothy in Kansas. But if you are fortunate, it may actually make sense.

In April 2012 a Pomeroy descendant contacted our director. She had traced her ancestry through a Peter Pomeroy in Illinois, but found Peter did not “link up” with our Eltweed Pomeroy family tree. She then asked a male relative to take a DNA test to help solve her “brick wall” She was surprised when instead of getting a Pomeroy match, the “markers” lined up with a PONTBRIANT line!

 Since we were doing research into the Louis and Jeremiah Pontbriand/Pomeroys families in New York State, it seemed promising to speculate Peter was somehow related to these families. It was a confusing trail, complicated by multiple marriages and half sibling relationships. There seemed to be no direct link to Louis and Jeremiah. Since sorting out these multiple marriages in the Quebec Drouin and Tanguay records was a challenging maze, I decided to push back to earlier generations and documents, and noticed that not only did our Louis Pontbriand in Onondaga and Oswego counties, marry three times, but so did his grandfather. I finally realized his grandfather, Jean Baptiste Briand dit Sansregret, was the key to unraveling my puzzle.

Louis Pontbriand, whose sons Louis and Germain (Jeremiah) migrated to New York with him (and his second wife Louisa), was the son of Jean Pierre Briand and Marguerite Lambert. 12 Jean Pierre, was the youngest surviving son of Jean Baptiste Briand dit Sansregret and third wife Marie Genevieve Cantara, born 1779. 13

However, Jean Baptiste Briand dit Sansregret was married three times. By his first wife, Francoise Jodouin, he had a son, Jean Baptiste Brilland born abt 1760.14. There was then about a twenty year difference in age between these half brothers. Descendants of Jean Baptiste Brilland emigrated into the town of Chazy, Clinton County, New York, while Louis Pontbriand and some of his family, including Lewis and Germain/Jeremiah, settled in Onondaga and Oswego counties.

Specifically, the elder half brother, John Baptiste Brilland, married Therese Perron, and their son Francois Eustache Pontbriand Sansregret married Felicite Vandal.15 A portion of this latter large family came to New York, and their surname became POMBRIO.16 One of their children was a Pierre, or Peter. Peter’s mother Felicite died in 1848, and his father remarried. In the 1850 census for Chazy, Clinton County, Peter is shown, as abt 11 years old, with his step-mother, and several siblings.17 I could not locate Peter in subsequent census records, nor in cemetery records, though other family members were located in the old St. Louis cemetery in Sciota. 18

A month ago, having already done some research in the Chazy, New York area, I came across a POMBRIO Family genealogical posting. Following this thread, I fortuitously found the genealogy work done by Susan L. Pombrio on the POMBRIO family ancestry. I received a copy of some of her research through the Northern New York American-Canadian Genealogical Society in Plattsburgh. “Pierre” is listed as the 12th child of Francois Eustache Pontbriand-Sansregret and Felicite Vandal. After his name she has noted “ b ca 1839 Sciota, NY went either west or south.”19 Oh happy day!

This was another piece in the Peter Pomeroy identity puzzle, one that supports our belief that the Peter Pomeroy in the U. S. 1860 Illinois census, is Peter/Pierre POMBRIO in the 1850 Clinton County census, a descendant, linked generations back to Jean Baptiste Briand dit Sansregret, and, therefore, linked to Louis and Germain.

 In the 1860 census of Plainfield, Illinois Peter’s place of birth is listed as Canada.20 It appears from the household that Peter is an apprentice in the John Virgil household. Virgil is a successful carriage maker, it seems, and Peter, age 21, is listed as a “wagon maker.” As he is unrelated to the family, as far as we know, it is not likely information was given to the census taker by Peter, but by John Virgil. It probably “sounded like” Peter was “French Canadian,” and certainly the head of household would have known some aspect of his origins. In subsequent census records, when Peter is head of household, Peter consistently states his place of birth as New York.

One descendant said family memoirs reported Peter never referred to his French Canadian heritage, but apparently told his adult sons he was a stowaway and came from France. Our research shows this unlikely, as do census records over the years where he himself claims his birth as New York State.

A great granddaughter of Peter Pomeroy, in writing to us, noted, according to Peter’s “Civil War Records that he was born in 1839 in New York.” The old Kansas GAR Post records in fact reported his birth locality as “Clinton City.” Well, that’s 50% correct.21 When Peter Pomeroy was 76 years old, he was listed in the 1915 Kansas State Census. He and wife Karen were living in Mulvane, Sedgwick County. He was cited as born abt 1839, in Clinton Co. NY. 22 

It seems at least, for the time being, I’m out of the labyrinth, even if all mysteries haven’t been solved. Still, part of the family story may be true. Peter may very well have run away from his Clinton County family sometime after 1850.

There is the possibility that he knew he had these half-cousins, Lewis and Jeremiah, in Oswego, and Verona, at this time. Perhaps he went as a young teenager to work with one of them, seeking an off-the-farm opportunity, especially since Jeremiah was listed as a boat captain. It would have been quite easy, from that point, to stowaway on a boat and find one’s way to Chicago. But then, that’s another puzzle.

Peter Pontbriand/Pombrio/Pomeroy died in 1916.23

 ENDNOTES

*The surname Pontbriand has been recorded and transcribed Pontbriant, Pontbrillant, in the Drouin Records of Quebec for the same person and family, but I have used the “d” spelling for consistency here. Some branches of these ancestors were recorded as Briand, and Briand dit Sansregret, as you will see, and the descendants of a branch in Clinton County retained the Americanized change to Pombrio as a surname.

1. We have used only first names of our information donors to protect their privacy. I’m using the spelling on Harriett’s gravestone, with two “ts” for Harriett’s given name throughout this text.

2. Sewell Chan, December 31, 2009, “On the Road: A Proudly Salty Reputation,” City Room, New York Times, online at: http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/31/on-the-road-a-proudly-salty-reputation/

3. Onondaga County Poorhouse records, Town of Onondaga Historical Society, 9/27/2012, Record Books HO-2, and M/W. Volunteer look-up by M. L. Michalec. It appears Jeremiah returned to the poorhouse after a dismissal in 1889. A later entry shows he died there September 6, 1890 or 1891, the date being difficult to determine due to confusion in page numbering.

4. 1855 New York State Census, Town of Schroeppel, Second District, Family 241. Ancestry.com.

5. 1892, New York State Census, First Election District, p. 2, line 12-13. Ancestry.com; also 1900 U. S. Census, Oswego, New York, 5A, Ed 108, line19-20.

6. In the matter of the estate of Louis Pontbriant-also known as Louis Pomeroy…, Surrogate Court, County of Oswego, New York, 12 September, 1910.

7. Marriage Horace W. Well and Nancy M. Pomeroy, Onondaga Standard, April 12, 1848, p. 3. C. 3

8. See: The Anastasie Raoul Collection, Onondaga Historical Association, Syracuse, New York at http://www.cnyhistory.org/

9. Ibid.

10. 1850 U. S. Census Chenango, Broome County, New York State, P. 348, Dwelling 1796, Fam 1866.

11. Charles Pomeroy married Mary Calkins of Lowell, Massachusetts in 1854 according to B. F. Hubbard’s The History of Stanstead County Province of Quebec, with Sketches of more that Five Hundred Families, (Quebec: Heritage, 1874), p. 123-124. A thank you to Guy G. for some confirmations and interesting new information.

12. Baptism of Louis Pontbriand, July 14, 1807, son of Jean Pontbriand and Marguerite Lambert. Yamaska, Quebec. Ancestry.com Quebec, (Drouin Collection, 1621-1967) [database online]

13. Marriage of Jean Briand dit Sansregret, widow of Jeanne Voine (Venne-Voyne) to Maria Cantara, 1779, Feb 15, Yamaska, Quebec. Drouin. Source same.

14. The marriage of Jean Brilland to Therese Perron, September, 1794, cites his parents as deceased Jean Baptiste Brilland and Francoise Jodouin. Drouin. Source same.

15. (1) Marriage of Jean Brilland, son of deceased Jean Baptiste Brilland and Francoise Jodouin, to Therese Perron, Sept 29, 1794. Contrecoeur, St-Trinite´ Quebec. (2) Marriage of F. Eustache, older son of Jean Baptiste PontBrillant and Therese Perron to Felicite Vandal, Jan 11, 1820, Sorel, St. Pierre, Quebec. Ancestry.com Quebec. Drouin. Source same.

16. See POMBRIO Family Genealogy researched by Susan L. Pombrio. Before coming into this family genealogy, I had noted this surname while looking at burials in St. Louis Roman Catholic Cemetery (see ftn 18) and researching the Clinton County census records.

 17. 1850 U. S. Census, Chazy, Clinton County, New York , p. 242, line 34 Dwelling: 1659, Family: 1768, “Eustace POBRIA.” Peter is cited age 11. Ancestry. Com.

18. St. Louis Roman Catholic Cemetery, (Sciota, Town of Chazy, Clinton County, NY.) Surname of POMBRAH shows Augustus, and Phillisa (Eustache and Felicite Pombrio Pontbriant). POMBRIO also recorded. Northern New York Tombstone Transcription Project at http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~frgen/clinton/chazy/st_louis.htm

19. Susan L. Pombrio, A Genealogy of the Pombrio Family in the United States, (#008), p. 45. provided by the Northern New York American-Canadian Genealogical Society Library, Plattsburgh, N.Y.

20. 1860 U.S. Census, Plainfield, Will County, Illinois, pg 164, line 1, part of John Virgil household, Family # 1223. Peter Pomeroy notes his birth location as New York in the 1885 and 1895 Kansas State Census records, and also in the 1870, 1900, 1910 U.S. census records. Ancestry.com

21. Kansas Grand Army of the Republic Post Reports, The James Shields Post 57 (1882-1937) Wellington County Sumner, Kansas records Peter Pomeroy mustered roll citing his birth location as “Clinton City.” Ancestry. Pomeroy served until the end of the war..

22. Kansas State Census Collection, 1855-1925, Reel K-1-K-271, Kansas State Historical Society, 1915 Census, p. 7, line 23, Family 10. Ancestry.com

23. Peter Pomeroy, died 1916. Kansas, Find A Grave Index, 1854-2012 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2012.